The OVF simulation and 5.76M dots evf is awesome on the R3. The R6 II viewfinder is simply not really sufficient for my liking. It is bothersome because I in any other case don't really need the attributes or expenditure of your EOS R5/ R3 or any other costly anticipated digital camera much like the R5 II.
The lens lineup is Establish around the prevailing indigenous Doing work EF line because it is senseless Formerly updated lenses to get replaced. The 2nd hand market is so low-priced that it is senseless picking everything distinct in the meanwhile In the event the photographs are what interests a person.
Certainly On this selling price classification so far it is the champ, IMHO. Practically nothing comes close to its capabilities at this price tag.
Canon ergonomics are without a doubt One of the easiest, and customarily way more usable than Sony. However Sony is normally rated Among the many poorest ergonomics to choose from.
one. Would you hand over exterior controls and / or enhance the size of your digicam to accomodate a bigger screen?
Just after taking pictures 1000s of frames on a pre-production R6 II about several days, I arrived away Using the perception that it could be a fairly quick digicam. Quickly is relative: the R6 II doesn't have a stacked sensor similar to the R3 (and at this price tag stage, I would not be expecting it to), but if you might want to shoot speedily, 40fps will get you there, and I used to be pleasantly stunned at how infrequently rolling shutter artifacts confirmed up in photos from quick-moving sporting activities.
I'd pay precisely the same cost as this for that R8 if it had the higher viewfinder, let us get in touch with it an R8 Super or even more possible R8 Mark IV circa 2027. The reduced pounds in the R8 is interesting, but no way am I going from 5d4 viewfinder to 2M dot EVF.
I do think the best implementation of rear screens till not too long ago has become from Panasonic with their tilt and swivel screens. The Sony A7RV I feel enhanced on that with their new rear monitor, anything I might wish to see Canon carry out. As for resolution & measurement, the R6ii is analogous to its peers & high-quality for its purpose.
With regard to your 2 content articles you referenced within your comment "Here is a Newer posting on the topic:"
three. Barring any regulatory need, no enterprise is obliged to allow 3rd events entry click here to their intelectual house or make it possible for them to circumnavigate their patents, whether or not by license or by ignoring the infringements.
We try out not to offer purple or inexperienced to information that happen to be a make any difference of flavor or particular choice: so a higher-res viewfinder is generally better than a low res one, so would receive a environmentally friendly box, a lot quicker burst taking pictures premiums are commonly a lot better than very low types (Be aware we're not factoring in regardless of whether you care
I've owned this camera since Xmas - I ditched my D850 and E-M1 Mark III for this, and it's been an exceptionally constructive expertise. Do I miss the resolution heading from 46 to 24?
Simply because your claim "Canon's blocking of third-party AF lenses" is not really legitimate. I'm a lot more than satisfied making use of Sigma Art lenses on my R6 without having restraints.
Last calendar year I did some portraits for the political candidate who ran for Govbernor and we utilize the 150mp Period 1 monster, so Certainly... in true existence more is a lot more.